plustek: CanoScan LiDE 30
Subject:
Re: CanoScan LiDE 30
From:
"Jaeger, Gerhard" ####@####.####
Date:
28 Dec 2002 13:00:25 -0000
Message-Id: <18SGSJ-1HpgKeC@fmrl10.sul.t-online.com>
One thing I've forgotten,
when using 0.45test4 and so on, there's no need to load
scanner.o, as libusb is supported:
plustek.conf
[usb] 0x04a9 0x220e
device auto
Gerhard
On Saturday, 28. December 2002 06:22, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> I tried out the very newest PlusTek backend, with no luck. Here's my
> problem report in case it is useful for developers.
>
> Jeff
>
> ==========
>
>
> $ sane-find-scanner
> found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9, product=0x220e) at libusb:001:005
>
> The box says CanoScan LiDE 30, but the USB matches CanoScan N1240U
> which has been working since 0.45-TEST4 of the PlusTek backend
> according to the website. So I built and installed sane 1.0.9 with the
> latest Plustek drivers under Debian Linux (unstable branch). No problems
> during the build.
>
> $ apt-get source sane-backends
> $ cd sane-backends-1.0.9
> $ tar xvzf ~/plustek-sane-0_44_10.tar.gz
> $ debuild -us -uc
> # dpkg --install ../*.deb
>
> I made sure there was a device entry and that the usb modules
> were loaded with correct parameters.
>
> # mknod /dev/usbscanner0 c 180 48
> # rmmod scanner
> # depmod scanner vendor=0x04a9 product=0x220e
>
> I appended to the end of /etc/plustek.conf:
>
> [usb] 0x04a9 0x220e
> device /dev/usbscanner0
>
> I tried VueScan (a commercial Linux scanner program) and it works
> fine; I was able to get successful captures. Unfortunately scanimage
> -L returns "No scanner was identified..." I am happy to provide more
> information or a remote login if that is helpful for driver
> developers.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
