plustek: RedHat 7.2, plustek sane 0_41_2, UT12, working.


Previous by date: 28 Jan 2002 16:53:47 -0000 Re: install sane backends, Aleksander Adamowski
Next by date: 28 Jan 2002 16:53:47 -0000 Re: scanning negatives with plustek UT24, Aleksander Adamowski
Previous in thread: 28 Jan 2002 16:53:47 -0000 RedHat 7.2, plustek sane 0_41_2, UT12, working., Kyrian
Next in thread: 28 Jan 2002 16:53:47 -0000 Re: RedHat 7.2, plustek sane 0_41_2, UT12, working., Kyrian

Subject: Re: RedHat 7.2, plustek sane 0_41_2, UT12, working.
From: Jacek Zapala ####@####.####
Date: 28 Jan 2002 16:53:47 -0000
Message-Id: <20020128175020.L10354@ipartners.pl>

* Kyrian ####@####.#### [020128 17:20] wrote:
> All,
> 
> Perhaps odd, perhaps not, this one.
> 
> Previously I'd only been able to get the plustek sane stuff working with
> a custom 2.4.17 kernel.
> 
> But I just reinstalled my machine with a vanilla RedHat 7.2
> distribution, installed one of my sane-backends RPM's (1.0.6-11 from
> http://kyrian.ore.org/RPMS/ which has 0_41_2 plustek sane code in it),
> restored my old /etc/modules.conf with the recommended values, made sure
> all of my USB modules were there, and had working, repeatable, stable
> scanning straight away.

How about using scan source 'negative' in xscanimage? Do you get the same
results on the consecutive scans of the same film frame with the same
parameters? I have problem with this on UT24.

	Jacek


Previous by date: 28 Jan 2002 16:53:47 -0000 Re: install sane backends, Aleksander Adamowski
Next by date: 28 Jan 2002 16:53:47 -0000 Re: scanning negatives with plustek UT24, Aleksander Adamowski
Previous in thread: 28 Jan 2002 16:53:47 -0000 RedHat 7.2, plustek sane 0_41_2, UT12, working., Kyrian
Next in thread: 28 Jan 2002 16:53:47 -0000 Re: RedHat 7.2, plustek sane 0_41_2, UT12, working., Kyrian


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.