[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Not a familiar error/syntax message.
From: Robert Warner ####@####.#### Date: 31 May 2002 02:00:42 -0000 Message-Id: <0205301752010C.03555@amdk62300> Hi, What does the following mean from the compiler? I'm not familiar with this message. oops (_rack + 1) oops (_rack + 2) oops (_rack + 3) Thanks Bob | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: Not a familiar error/syntax message.
From: Scott Dattalo ####@####.#### Date: 31 May 2002 04:12:43 -0000 Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205302100090.8118-100000@ruckus.brouhaha.com> On Thu, 30 May 2002, Robert Warner wrote: > Hi, > > What does the following mean from the compiler? I'm not familiar with this > message. > oops (_rack + 1) > oops (_rack + 2) > oops (_rack + 3) This is a debugging statement I neglected to remove. Specifically, at one point I was having problems with multi-byte register allocation and this would appear when those variables were being allocated. There's no cause for alarm - that bug has been fixed. Scott | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] |