[<<] [<] Page 2 of 2 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: gpsim-0.21.2 & lcd-0.2.1
From: Scott Dattalo ####@####.#### Date: 10 Feb 2004 04:10:48 -0000 Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402091931180.30864-100000@ruckus.brouhaha.com> On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, David Willmore wrote: <snip> > Compared to all of the complexity of the design of gpsim, the amount > of time we've already spent arguing about the NULL pointer is getting > rediculous. I asked a few others who I worked with and the answer basically boiled down to preference. One can argue either side of the issue. I decided to just do away with NULL. Scott | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[<<] [<] Page 2 of 2 [>] [>>] |