[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
fedora
From: John De Villiers ####@####.#### Date: 3 Apr 2004 10:47:25 +0100 Message-Id: <1080983676.22638.18.camel@bbj> Has anyone tried compiling the gpasm / gpsim suite under fedora yet? It should all work, but knowing the way the red-had guys decide to change (package) things theres no telling what has changed with fedora. Im considering making the move to fedora but need to test a lot of things first. John | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: fedora
From: Craig Franklin ####@####.#### Date: 7 Apr 2004 02:28:50 +0100 Message-Id: <1081247295.1443.9.camel@r2d2> On Sat, 2004-04-03 at 03:14, John De Villiers wrote: > Has anyone tried compiling the gpasm / gpsim suite under fedora yet? > Sorry for the delay. Has your question been answered? I haven't tried. > It should all work, but knowing the way the red-had guys decide to > change (package) things theres no telling what has changed with fedora. > You shouldn't have any problem with gputils. > Im considering making the move to fedora but need to test a lot of > things first. > > John > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.#### > For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.#### > | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] |