gnupic: Thread: Re. gpsim, an error in the names?

Néstor A. Marchesini wrote:-
....
> ReadEeprom
>       bcf     STATUS,RP0
>       bsf     STATUS,RP1
>       movwf   EEADR
>       bsf     STATUS,RP0
>       bcf     EECON1,EEPGD
>       bsf     EECON1,RD
>       bcf     STATUS,RP0
>       movf    EEDATA,W
>       bcf     STATUS,RP1
>       return
> 
> gpsim> step
> 0x0000000000000012  p16F873  0x0058  0x2068  call       0x0068
> SetPC address = 0x68, row = 265
> gpsim> step
> 0x0000000000000014  p16F873  0x0068  0x1283  bcf        status,5
>    read: 0x3c from status
>   wrote: 0x1c to status
> SetPC address = 0x69, row = 266
> gpsim> step
> 0x0000000000000015  p16F873  0x0069  0x1703  bsf        status,6
>    read: 0x1c from status
>   wrote: 0x5c to status
> SetPC address = 0x6a, row = 267
> gpsim> step
> 0x0000000000000016  p16F873  0x006A  0x008D  movwf      pir2v2
>    read: 0x00 from W
>   wrote: 0x00 to eeadr
> SetPC address = 0x6b, row = 268
> 

Is this what gpsim's output looks like ?    Looks interesting.
Many of us become wary of downloading projects which will just 
consume time without helping to progress.

I had an impression that gpsim was M$-Win-based  ?

== Chris Glur.

> Is this what gpsim's output looks like ?    Looks interesting.
> Many of us become wary of downloading projects which will just 
> consume time without helping to progress.
> 
> I had an impression that gpsim was M$-Win-based  ?

That is the output of the text window from which gpsim is
launched.  It has a nice textual debugger interface just
like gdb and friends.  So, if that's all you want, you
can use just that.  At this stage of development, it's
important to have that kind of low level access to debug
gpsim itself.  

For me, that window is covered up by the graphical windows
that display the code, the registers, the watch window, the
virtual breadboard, etc.  Only if something goes wrong, do
I need to look at that window.

So, you're right, it is a nice graphical application.  I
was actually quite stunned the first time I ran it.  It has
a lot of wonderful features that I have come to love.

Gpsim has certainly helped my coding! It may not be perfect,
but it's better than my code tends to be. :)

Cheers,
David

On -1 xxx -1 ####@####.#### wrote:

<snip>

> I had an impression that gpsim was M$-Win-based  ?

Interesting. Based on your recent GNUPIC mailing list activity, I had the
impression you knew what gpsim was. Read all about gpsim here:

http://www.dattalo.com/gnupic/gpsim.html

Scott