gnupic: Thread: Re: [gnupic] What happened to GPAL

On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 03:05:32PM -0500, Jaime Alberto Silva wrote:
> Did GPAL died?

Shelved.

> Has it been replaced by other project?

Nope.

> Was it moved away from gnupic?

I think Craig removed it for the time being.

> Where can I find it?

Not sure. Check the gnupic archives to see the last status on it.

It wasn't ready for public consumption. Hence the move.

BAJ

Jaime Alberto Silva wrote:
> Did GPAL died?
> Has it been replaced by other project?
> Was it moved away from gnupic?
> Where can I find it?

http://www.linuxhacker.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?1:mss:3739:200501:dddpemeidjofapjijpei
http://www.linuxhacker.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?1:mss:4135:200505:ldpolbdcmbkdcnjahnpn

http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/gputils/gputils/gpal/Attic/

I suspect the stuff in the CVS Attic is incompatible now with the rest 
of gputils.

Scott

Also I tagged the source before and after the removal.

"after-gpal-removal"
"before-gpal-removal"

Byron A Jeff wrote:

>On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 03:05:32PM -0500, Jaime Alberto Silva wrote:
>  
>
>>Did GPAL died?
>>    
>>
>
>Shelved.
>
>  
>
>>Has it been replaced by other project?
>>    
>>
>
>Nope.
>
>  
>
>>Was it moved away from gnupic?
>>    
>>
>
>I think Craig removed it for the time being.
>
>  
>
>>Where can I find it?
>>    
>>
>
>Not sure. Check the gnupic archives to see the last status on it.
>
>It wasn't ready for public consumption. Hence the move.
>
>BAJ
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
>For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>
>
>  
>

Will you continue with GPAL development later? or is it better to use sdcc?

On 3/27/06, Craig Franklin ####@####.#### wrote:
>
> Also I tagged the source before and after the removal.
>
> "after-gpal-removal"
> "before-gpal-removal"
>
> Byron A Jeff wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 03:05:32PM -0500, Jaime Alberto Silva wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Did GPAL died?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Shelved.
> >
> >
> >
> >>Has it been replaced by other project?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Nope.
> >
> >
> >
> >>Was it moved away from gnupic?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >I think Craig removed it for the time being.
> >
> >
> >
> >>Where can I find it?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Not sure. Check the gnupic archives to see the last status on it.
> >
> >It wasn't ready for public consumption. Hence the move.
> >
> >BAJ
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> >For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>
>


-- 
Jaime Alberto Silva Colorado

Hi!
As far as I know, GPAL is planned to reborn some day...

If you'll decide to select another compiler, it's a good idea to go to 
http://www.gnupic.org or to http://www.rfc1149.net/devel/picforth. There 
are good lists of compilers.

If you like languages like GPAL, I'd suggest you to look at JAL 
<http://jal.sourceforge.net/> project: its syntax is very close to one 
used in GPAL.

Also you may choose SDCC, if you prefer C programming language.

Another good choice is Forth <http://pic18forth.sourceforge.net/>, 
<http://www.rfc1149.net/devel/picforth> - a language with unusual 
syntax, but a lot of power inside.

And, at the end of this list, I can't say nothing about Pyastra 
<http://pyastra.sourceforge.net/>, a choice for the case you like Python 
programming language.

Jaime Alberto Silva wrote:
> Will you continue with GPAL development later? or is it better to use 
> sdcc?
>
> On 3/27/06, Craig Franklin ####@####.#### wrote:
>>
>> Also I tagged the source before and after the removal.
>>
>> "after-gpal-removal"
>> "before-gpal-removal"
>>
>> Byron A Jeff wrote:
>>
>> >On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 03:05:32PM -0500, Jaime Alberto Silva wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >>Did GPAL died?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >Shelved.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >>Has it been replaced by other project?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >Nope.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >>Was it moved away from gnupic?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >I think Craig removed it for the time being.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >>Where can I find it?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >Not sure. Check the gnupic archives to see the last status on it.
>> >
>> >It wasn't ready for public consumption. Hence the move.
>> >
>> >BAJ
>> >
>> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
>> >For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
>> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>>
>>
>
>

-- 

Best regards,
Alex Ziranov.

On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 02:30:14PM -0500, Jaime Alberto Silva wrote:
> Will you continue with GPAL development later? or is it better to use sdcc?

GPAL was and still is alpha status code. It's not ready for production use.

sdcc is a more mature product of course.

And there's always gpasm which is rock solid. I've been using it for projects
over the last several years.

I just think it's a bad idea to pin your development of a system that currently
isn't released and is in the alpha stage of development.

BAJ