[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
PIC 16F690
From: "Theodore D. Sternberg" ####@####.#### Date: 22 May 2007 06:21:20 +0100 Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0705212332380.20298@trhj.homeunix.net> Hi, A couple years back, there was an exchange between Scott Dattalo and a user asking about support for the PIC 16F690. Scott answered that there was as yet no support, but that he could whip up PWM-less 16F690 support in not much time. The user responded enthusiastically, and that was the end of the thread. I'd like to add my voice to that user's, and say that even limited support for the f690 would be really great. A lot of people are probably getting used to the f690, since it's what the popular PICkit2 comes with. - Ted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] |