[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: gputils issue
From: David ####@####.#### Date: 21 Aug 2007 15:13:54 +0100 Message-Id: <20070821100910.1378f2d1@DEEPTHOUGHT.BARNET.net> On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:16:09 -0700 "James Cleland" ####@####.#### wrote: > Message body follows: > > Hi, > > First off, I was wondering if you were still active with > gputils. I'm the current maintainer, but haven't been very active the past month or two. Life gets in the way and all... > If so, I was wondering if you could tell me if the following is > normal: > The problem I'm having is that, when debugging, I can't set > breakpoints inside the library asm files. If I step into subroutines > within the library, I can follow the code into the file, although > MPLAB asks me to browse to a directory sometimes (no big deal). In short, I don't really know. MPLAB has had several issues with setting breakpoints, but I haven't used or worked on gplib yet, and I haven't used MPLIB, either. So I don't know what's normal for libraries. You can try creating the library from MPLIB to narrow down the problem. I would guess either there are symbols missing or incorrect with gputils or it's a problem with MBLAB. By the way, if you could please subscribe to ####@####.#### and send gputils-related email there, I or whoever else is maintaining gputils will definitely hear you, and probably someone there could answer this particular question better. I've copied them on this message. David Barnett | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] |