| [<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Subject:
Re: [gnupic] GPasm include files
From: Rob Pearce ####@####.#### Date: 6 Jul 2008 16:39:20 -0000 Message-Id: <200807061739.14410.rob@bdt-home.demon.co.uk> On Sunday 06 July 2008, Rob Hamerling wrote: > I would think this should be 'GPASM' in stead of 'MPASM'. Only if you rashly assume that gpasm has its own unique set of include files. Given that the aim is to be 100% mpasm source compatible, it actually makes a lot of sense to ship with unmodified mpasm headers. Check a few lines above and you'll see the header has a Microchip Technology, Inc. version / copyright tag. Rob | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| [<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||